Groupe et animation

Ce site propose une synthèse de la documentation scientifique contemporaine sur le travail en groupe et la conduite des réunions de travail. La perspective adoptée est communicationnelle, c’est-à-dire centrée sur les interactions entre les membres.

Le modèle présenté s’inscrit dans la tradition québécoise de formation en relations humaines et des travaux sur le groupe et l’animation, telle que développée à l’Université de Sherbrooke et à l’UQAM, notamment enseignée au programme en Communication humaine et organisationnelle.

Les caractéristiques individuelles (âge, sexe, traits psychologiques, etc.) ne sont abordées que sous l’angle de leurs contributions aux interactions et aux phénomènes affectant les groupes de travail.

Le site comporte deux grandes sections : Groupe de travail et Conduite et animation des réunions.

La première présente les principaux processus et phénomènes émergents au sein des groupes de travail. La seconde présente des interventions et des techniques de conduites et d’animation de réunion, en fonction des grands ensembles thématiques de processus et de phénomènes de groupes.

Département de communication sociale et publique de l’Université du Québec à Montréal.

Tous deux enseignent la théorie et la pratique du travail en groupe ainsi que la conduite de réunions, depuis 1979 dans le cas de Pierre et depuis 1993 dans le cas de Johanne.

Nous vous invitons chaleureusement à nous faire parvenir vos commentaires et suggestions.

Pierre Mongeau et Johanne Saint-Charles

• Mongeau, Pierre et Saint-Charles, J. (2019). L’approche communicationnelle des groupes de travail en organisation. Dans La communication organisationnelle : Approches, processus et enjeux (pp. 237‑280). (S.l.): Luc Bonneville et Slyvie Grosjean.

• Mongeau, P., et Saint-Charles, J. (2020). Arrimer les pratiques d’animation avec les études sur les groupes et les réunions. Communiquer. Revue de communication sociale et publique, 30, 53‑69. https://doi.org/10.4000/communiquer.7337

Abrams, D., A. Hogg, M., Hinkle, S. et Otten, S. (2005). The Social Identity Perspective on Small Groups. Dans M. S. Poole et A. B. Hollinghead (dir.), Theories of Small Groups (p. 99‑137). Thousand Oaks : Sage.

Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M. et Gurău, C. (2011). Virtual Team Performance in a Highly Competitive Environment. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 161‑190. https://doi: 10.1177/1059601110391251.

Alvesson, M. et Spicer, A. (2011). Metaphors we lead by: understanding leadership in the real world. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge. Récupéré de Library of Congress.

Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123‑148. https://doi: 10.2307/256633

Ancona, D. et Caldwell, D. (1998). Rethinking Team Composition From the Outside. [Rethinking Team Composition From the Outside]. Dans Research on Managing in Groups and Teams. Greenwich : JAI Press.

Anzieu, D. et Martin, J.-Y. (1968). La dynamique des groupes restreints (13e édition 2013). Paris : PUF.

Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E. et Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small Group as Complex Systems. Thousand Oaks, Californie : Sage Publications.

Arrow, Holly, Poole, M. S., Henry, K. B., Wheelan, S. et Moreland, R. (2004). Time, Change, and Development: The Temporal Perspective on Groups. Small Group Research, 35(1), 73‑105. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496403259757

Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R. et Cooren, F. (2009). 1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1‑64. https://doi: 10.1080/19416520903047186

Baker, P. M. (1984). Seeing Is Behaving: Visibility and Participation in Small Groups. Environment and Behavior, 16(2), 159‑184. https://doi: 10.1177/0013916584162002

Bales, R. F. (1950). A Set of Categories for the Analysis of Small Group Interaction. American Sociological Review, 15(2), 257‑263. https://doi: 10.2307/2086790

Bales, R. F. (1953). The Equilibrium Problem in Small Groups. [The Equilibrium Problem in Small Groups]. Dans Working Papers in the Theory of Action. Glencoe, IL : Free Press.

Balkundi, P. et Harrison, D. A. (2006). Ties, Leaders, and Time in Teams: Strong Inference About Network Structure’s Effects on Team Viability and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 49‑68. https://doi: 10.2307/20159745

Barash, D. P. (1973). Human ethology: Personal space reiterated. Environment and Behavior, 67‑72.

Barge, J. Kevin et Hirokawa, R. Y. (1989). Toward a Communication Competency Model of Group Leadership. Small Group Behavior, 20(2), 167‑189. https://doi: 10.1177/104649648902000203

Barge, J.K. (1996). Leadership Skills and Dialectics of Leadership in Group Decision Making. [Leadership Skills and Dialectics of Leadership in Group Decision Making]. Dans Communication and group decision making (p. 301‑342). London : Sage.

Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York : Free Press.

Bazarova, N. N. et Walther, J. B. (2009). Attributions in Virtual Groups: Distances and Behavioral Variations in Computer-Mediated Discussions. Small Group Research, 40(2), 138‑162. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496408328490

Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J. et McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989‑1004. https://doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989

Behfar, K. J., Mannix, E. A., Peterson, R. S. et Trochim, W. M. (2011a). Conflict in Small Groups: The Meaning and Consequences of Process Conflict. Small Group Research, 42(2), 127‑176. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496410389194

Behfar, K. J., Mannix, E. A., Peterson, R. S. et Trochim, W. M. (2011b). Conflict in Small Groups: The Meaning and Consequences of Process Conflict. Small Group Research, 42, 127‑176. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496410389194

Benne, K. D. et Sheats, P. (1948). Functional Roles of Group Members. Journal of Social Issues, 4(2), 41‑49. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1948.tb01783.x

Bennis, W. G., & Shepard, H. A. (1956). A Theory of Group Development. Human Relations, 9(4), 415‑437. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675600900403

Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2), 345‑381. https://doi: 10.1177/014920639101700205

Bettenhausen, K. L. et Murnighan, J. K. (1991). The Development of an Intragroup Norm and the Effects of Interpersonal and Structural Challenges. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1), 20‑35. https://doi: 10.2307/2393428

Black, E. B. (1955). A consideration of the rhetorical causes of breakdown in discussion. Speech Monographs, 22(1), 15‑19.

Blackburn, R., Furst, S. et Rosen, B. (2003). Building a Winning Virtual Team: KSAs, Selection, Training, and Evaluation. The Jossey-Bass business & management series. Dans C. B. Gibson et S. G. Cohen (dir.), Virtual teams that work: creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (1st ed, p. 95‑120). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass. Récupéré de Library of Congress ISBN. (HD66 .V57 2003)

Blanchet, C., & Michinov, E. (2016). Les équipes de travail dynamiques. L’instabilité dans les equipes de travail : Quels effets sur les performances ? Le travail humain, 79(4), 309‑338. https://doi.org/10.3917/th.794.0309

Blood, R. O. et Livant, W. P. (1957). The Use of Space within the Cabin Group. Journal of Social Issues, 13(1), 47‑53. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1957.tb01377.x

Bochner, A. P. (2002). Perspectives on inquiry III: The moral of stories. Dans The handbook of interpersonal communication (M. Knapp & J. Daley). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bonito, J. A. (2004). Shared Cognition and Participation in Small Groups: Similarity of Member Prototypes. Communication Research, 31(6), 704‑730. https://doi: 10.1177/0093650204269406

Bonito, J. A. et Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in Small Groups. Annals of the International Communication Association, 20(1), 227‑261. https://doi: 10.1080/23808985.1997.11678943

Bonito, J. A., Wittenbaum, G. et Hirokawa, R. Y. (2009). Small Group Communication. Communication series Communication theory and methodology. Dans D. W. Stacks et M. B. Salwen (dir.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (2. ed, p. 348‑369). New York, NY : Routledge. Récupéré de Gemeinsamer Bibliotheksverbund ISBN. 

Borgatti, S. P. et Foster, P. C. (2003). The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. Journal of Management, 29, 991‑1013. https://doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4

Bormann, E. (1975). Discussion and Group Methods : Theory and Practice. Harper & Row.

Bormann, E. (1975). Discussion and Group Methods : Theory and Practice. New York : Harper & Row.

Bormann, E. (1990). Small Group Communication. Theory and Practice. New York : Harper & Row.

Bormann, E. G. (1985). Symbolic Convergence Theory: A Communication Formulation. Journal of Communication, 35, 128‑138.

Bormann, E. G., Cragan, J. F. et Shields, D. C. (2001). Chapter 8: Three Decades of Developing, Grounding, and Using Symbolic Convergence Theory (SCT). Communication Yearbook, 25, 271‑313.

Bosch-Sijtsema, P. M., Fruchter, R., Vartiainen, M. et Ruohomäki, V. (2011). A Framework to Analyze Knowledge Work in Distributed Teams. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 275‑307. https://doi: 10.1177/1059601111403625

Boulding, K. E. (1962). Conflict and defense. New York : Harper and Brothers.

Bowers, C. A., Pharmer, J. A. et Salas, E. (2000). When Member Homogeneity is Needed in Work Teams: A Meta-Analysis. Small Group Research, 31(3), 305‑327. https://doi: 10.1177/104649640003100303

Braaten, L. J. (1974). Developmental phases of encounter groups and related intensive groups. Interpersonal Development, 5(2), 112‑129.

Braaten, L. J. (1991). Group cohesion : A new multidimensional model. Group, 15(1), 39‑55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419845

Brass, D. J. et Krackhardt, D. (1999). Social Capital for Twenty-first Century Leaders. Dans J. G. Hunt et R. L. Phillips (dir.), Out-of-the Box Leadership Challenges for the 21st Century Army (p. 179‑194).

Brass, D. J. et Krackhardt, D. (2012). Politics in organizations: theory and research considerations. [Politics in organizations]. Dans G. R. Ferris et D. C. Treadway (dir.), SIOP organizational frontiers series (p. 355‑375). New York : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Récupéré de Library of Congress ISBN. (HD58.7 .P647 2012)

Bray, S. R. et Brawley, L. R. (2002). Role Efficacy, Role Clarity, and Role Performance Effectiveness. Small Group Research, 33(2), 233‑253. https://doi: 10.1177/104649640203300204

Brown, T. M. et Miller, C. E. (2000). Communication Networks in Task-Performing Groups: Effects of Task Complexity, Time Pressure, and Interpersonal Dominance. Small Group Research, 31(2), 131‑157. https://doi: 10.1177/104649640003100201

Burger, J. M. (1987). Desire for control and conformity to a perceived norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 355‑360.

Burke, K., Aytes, K. et Chidambaram, L. (2001). Media effects on the development of cohesion and process satisfaction in computer‐supported workgroups ‐ An analysis of results from two longitudinal studies. Information Technology & People, 14(2), 122‑141. https://doi: 10.1108/09593840110397894

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Dans N. Nohria et R. G. Eccles (dir.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (N. Nohria et R. G. Eccles, p. 57‑91). Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.

Burt, R. S. (2006). Emotional Activity around Structural Holes.

Bushe, G. R., & Coetzer, G. H. (2007). Group Development and Team Effectiveness : Using Cognitive Representations to Measure Group Development and Predict Task Performance and Group Viability. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 184‑212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306298892

Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3(1), 14‑25. https://doi: 10.1002/bs.3830030103

Carlyle, T. (1840). Heroes and Hero-Worship. (s. l. n. é.).

Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., Braun, M. T. et Contractor, N. S. (2015). Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 597‑622. https://doi: 10.1037/a0038922

Cartwright, D. (1968). Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. Dans D. Cartwright et A. Zander (dir.), Group Dynamics: Research and Theory (3ième, p. 91‑109). New York : Harper & Row.

Chang, A. et Bordia, P. (2001). A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship. Small Group Research, 32(4), 379‑405. https://doi: 10.1177/104649640103200401

Chemers, M. L. (1983). Leadership theory and research: A systems-process integration. Dans P. B. Paulus (dir.), Basic group processes (p. 9‑39). New York : Springer-Verlag.

Cherns, A. (1987). Principles of Sociotechnical Design Revisted. Human Relations, 40(3), 153‑161. https://doi: 10.1177/001872678704000303

Chernyshenko, O. S., Miner, A. G., Baumann, M. R. et Sniezek, J. A. (2003). The impact of information distribution, ownership, and discussion on group member judgment: The differential cue weighting model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(1), 12‑25. https://doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00533-2

Chidambaram, L. et Bostrom, R. (1997). Group Development (I): A Review and Synthesis of Development Models. Group Decision and Negotiation, 6(2), 159‑187. Récupéré de http://dx.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008603328241

Chiocchio, F. et Essiembre, H. (2009). Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review of Disparities Between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams. Small Group Research, 40(4), 382‑420. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496409335103

Chiriac, E. H. (2008). A scheme for understanding group processes in problem-based learning. Higher Education, 55(5), 505‑518. https://doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9071-7

Cohendet, P., Roberts, J. et Simon, L. (2010). Créer, implanter et gérer des communautés de pratique. Gestion, Vol.35(4), 31. https://doi: 10.3917/riges.354.0031

Cosier, R. A. et Rose, G. L. (1977). Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19(2), 378‑391. https://doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(77)90071-X

Crozier, M. et Friedberg, E. (1977). L’acteur et le système. Paris : Éditions du Seuil.

Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352‑364. https://doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134

David Melamed et Scott V. Savage. (2016). Status, Faction Sizes, and Social Influence: Testing the Theoretical Mechanism. AJS, 122, July 2016.

Davies, D. (1994). Learning network design: Coordinating group interactions in formal learning environments over time and distance. [Learning network design: Coordinating group interactions in formal learning environments over time and distance]. Dans NATO ASI Series F: Computer and systems sciences: Vol. 128 (p. 101‑123). New York.

De Visscher, P. (1991). Us, avatars et métamorphoses de la dynamique des groupes — une brève histoire des groupes restreints. Grenoble : Presses universitaires de Grenoble.

DeLong, A. J. (1970). Dominance-territorial relations in a small group. Environment and Behavior, (2), 170‑191.

Den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A. et Dorfman, P. W. (1999). Culture Specific and Cross-Culturally Generalizable Implicit Leadership Theories: Are Attributes of Charismatic/Transformational Leadership Universally Endorsed? Leadership Quarterly, 10, 219‑256. https://doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00018-1

Dinh, J. E. et Lord, R. G. (2012). Implications of dispositional and process views of traits for individual difference research in leadership. Leadership Quarterly. https://doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.003

Driskell, J. E., Radtke, P. H. et Salas, E. (2003). Virtual Teams: Effects of Technological Mediation on Team Performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(4), 297‑323. https://doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.7.4.297

Dunphy, D. C. (1968). Phases, roles, and myths in self-analytic groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 4(2), 195‑225.

Emery, C., Daniloski, K. et Hamby, A. (2011). The Reciprocal Effects of Self-View as a Leader and Leadership Emergence. Small Group Research, 42, 199‑224. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496410389494

Erickson, T. (1993). From Interface to Interplace: The Spatial Environment as a Medium for Interaction. Published in the Proceedings of Conference on Spatial Information Theory.

Evans, C. R. et Dion, K. L. (1991). Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Small Group Research, 22(2), 175‑186. Récupéré de http://sgr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/22/2/175

Fairhurst, G. T. (2007). Discursive Leadership. In conversation with Leadership Psychologoy. Thousand Oaks : Sage.

Fairhurst, G. T. (2008). Discursive Leadership: A Communication Alternative to Leadership Psychology. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 510‑521. https://doi: 10.1177/0893318907313714

Fairhurst, G. T. et Cooren, F. (2009). Leader ship as the Hybrid Production of Presence(s). Leadership, 5, 496‑490.

Fairhurst, G. T. et Sarr, R. A. (1996). The Art of Framing: Managing the Language of Leadership. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.

Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R. et Byington, E. (2006). How, When, and Why Bad Apples Spoil the Barrel: Negative Group Members and Dysfunctional Groups. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 175‑222. https://doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27005-9

Feshbach, S. et Feshbach, N. (1963). Influence of the stimulus object upon the complementary and supplementary projection of fear, 468‑502.

Fiedler, F. E. (1978). The contingency model and the dynamics of the leadership process. Dans Berkowitz (dir.), Advances in experimental social psychology (p. 59‑112). New York : Academic Press.

Fine, G. A. et Soucey, M. de. (2005). Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 18(1), 1‑22. https://doi: 10.1515/humr.2005.18.1.1

Fisher, A. B. (1986). Leadership. When Does the Difference Make a Difference. Dans R. Y. Hirokawa et M. S. Poole (dir.), Communication and Group Decision-making (p. 198‑215). Beverly Hills : Sage.

Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia : University of South Carolina Press.

Fluk, J. et McGrath, J. E. (2005). Touchstones: A framework for Comparing Premises of nine Integrative Perspective on Groups. [Touchstones: A framework for Comparing Premises of nine Integrative Perspective on Groups]. Dans Theories of Small Groups (p. 397‑426). Thousand Oaks : Sage.

Forsyth, D. R. (2019). Group dynamics (Seventh edition). Boston, MA : Cengage. Récupéré de Library of Congress ISBN. (302.34)

Foti, R. J. et Luch, C. H. (1992). The Influence of Individual Differences on the Perception and Categorization of Leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 55‑66. https://doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(92)90006-2

Freeman, L. C., Roeder, D. et Mulholland, R. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: II. Experimental Results. Social Networks, 119‑141.

French, J. R. P. et Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. [The Bases of Social Power]. Dans Studies in Social Power (p. 150‑167). Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.

Frey, L. R. (2008). Group Communication. Dans W. Donsbach (dir.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi: 10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecg028

Frey, L. R. (dir.). (2003). Group Communication in Context. Studies of Bona Fide Groups. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.

Frey, L. R. et Sunwolf. (2004). The Symbolic-Interpretive Perspective on Group Dynamics. Small Group Research, 35(3), 277‑306. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496404263771

Frey, L. R., Tracy, K. et Standerfer, C. (2003). Selecting a School Superintendendent: Sensitivities in Group Deliberation. Dans Group Communication in Context. Studies of Bona Fide Groups (p. 109‑134). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.

Friedkin, N. E. et Johnsen. E. C. (2011). Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics. New York : Cambridge University Press.

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. : Prentice Hall.

Gersick, C. J. (1991). Revolutionary Change Theories: A Multi-Level Exploration of the Punctuated Equilibrium Paradigm. Academy of Management Journal, (16), 10‑36.

Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and Transition in Work Teams : Toward a New Model of Group Development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9‑41. https://doi.org/10.5465/256496

Giddens, A. (1984). The constituion of society. Berkeley : University of California Press.

Gist, M. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 472‑485.

Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499. https://doi: 10.2307/2392936

Glasl, F. (1982). The process of conflict escalation and roles of third parties. Dans G. B. J. Bomers & R. Peterson (dir.), Conflict management and industrial relations (p. 119‑140). Boston : Kluwer-Nijhoff.

González-Navarro, P., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., Ripoll, P. et Peiró, J. M. (2010). Group interaction styles in a virtual context: The effects on group outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1472‑1480. https://doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.026

Gouran, D. et Hirokawa, R. (1996). Functional theory and communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view. [Functional theory and communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view]. Dans R. Hirokawa et M. Poole (dir.), Communication and group decision making (p. 55‑80). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

Graham, E. E., Papa, M. J. et McPherson, M. B. (1997). An applied test of the functional communication perspective of small group decision-making. Southern Communication Journal, (62), 269‑279.

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). La force des liens faibles. Dans Le marché autrement (p. 45‑72, 2000 pour la traduction française, trad.). Paris : Desclée de Brouwer.

Greenberg, J. (1976). The Role of Seating Position in Group Interaction: A Review, with Applications for Group Trainers. Group & Organization Studies, 1(3), 310‑327. https://doi: 10.1177/105960117600100306

Greene, C. N. (1989). Cohesion and Productivity in Work Groups. Small Group Behavior, 20(1), 70‑86. https://doi: 10.1177/104649648902000106

Greer, L. L., Jehn, K. A. et Mannix, E. A. (2008). Conflict Transformation: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Relationships Between Different Types of Intragroup Conflict and the Moderating Role of Conflict Resolution. Small Group Research, 39, 278‑302.

Griffith, T. L., Mannix, E. A. et Neale, M. A. (2003). Conflict and Virtual Teams. The Jossey-Bass business & management series. Dans C. B. Gibson et S. G. Cohen (dir.), Virtual teams that work: creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (1st ed). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass. Récupéré de Library of Congress ISBN. (HD66 .V57 2003)

Guastello, S. J. (2007). Non-linear dynamics and leadership emergence. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 357‑369. https://doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.005

Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J. et Whitney, D. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26, 497‑520.

Gully, Stanley M., Devine, D. J. et Whitney, D. J. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance: Effects of Level of Analysis and Task Interdependence. Small Group Research, 43(6), 702‑725. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496412468069

Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and Those That Don’t). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Haines, R. (2014). Group development in virtual teams: An experimental reexamination. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 213‑222. https://doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.019

Halfhill, T., Sundstrom, E., Lahner, J., Calderone, W. et Nielsen, T. M. (2005). Group Personality Composition and Group Effectiveness: An Integrative Review of Empirical Research. Small Group Research, 36(1), 83‑105. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496404268538

Hare, A. et Bales, R. F. (1963). Seating Position and Small Group Interaction. Sociometry, (26), 480‑486.

Hare, A. P. (2003). Roles, Relationships, And Groups In Organizations: Some Conclusions And Recommendations. Small Group Research, 34(2), 123‑154. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496402250430

Harper, N. L. et Askling, L. R. (1980). Group communication and quality of task solution in a media production organization. Communication Monographs, (47), 77‑100.

Hebl, M. R. (1995). Gender Bias in Leader Selection. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 186‑188.

Henry, K. B., Arrow, H. et Carini, B. (1999). A Tripartite Model of Group Identification: Theory and Measurement. Small Group Research, 30(5), 558‑581. 

Hertel, G., Geister, S. et Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69‑95. https://doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002

Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S. et Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 43‑64. https://doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43

Hirokawa, R. (1988). Group Communication & Decision-Making Performance: A Continued Test of the Functional Perspective. Human Communication Research, 14, 487‑515.

Hirokawa, R. Y. et Salazar, A. J. (1999). Task-Group Communication and Decision-making Performance. Dans L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran et M. S. Poole (dir.), Handbook of Group Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

Hogg, M. A. et Reid, S. A. (2006). Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7‑30. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x

Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S. et Hinkle, S. (2004). The Social Identity Perspective: Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups. Small Group Research, 35(3), 246‑276. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496404263424

Holahan, C. J. (1982). Environmental Psychology. New York : Random House.

Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23(2), 193‑219.

Homans, G. C. (1950). The Human Group. New York : Harcourt, Brace & World.

Jackson, S. E. (1996). The Consequences of Diversity in Multidisciplinary Work Teams. [The Consequences of Diversity in Multidisciplinary Work Teams]. Dans Handbook of Work Group Psychology. John Wiley & Sons.

Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decision and fiascoes. Boston : Houghton Mifflin et Free Association Books.

Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink. Boston MA : Houghton Mifflin et Free Association Books.

Jans, L., Postmes, T. et Van der Zee, K. I. (2011). The induction of shared identity: The positive role of individual distinctiveness for groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1130‑1141.

Jarvenpaa, S. L., Rao, V. S. et Huber, G. P. (1988). Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: A field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 12, 645‑666.

Jehn, K. A. et Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238‑251. https://doi: 10.2307/3069453

Jehn, Karen A. (1997). A quantitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly.

Jehn, Karen A. (1999). Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly.

Jehn, Karen A. et Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: A Contingency Perspective on the Conflict-Outcome Relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187‑242. https://doi: 10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25005-x

Johnson, A. R., van de Schoot, R., Delmar, F. et Crano, W. D. (2015). Social Influence Interpretation of Interpersonal Processes and Team Performance Over Time Using Bayesian Model Selection. Journal of Management, 41, 574‑606. https://doi: 10.1177/0149206314539351

Johnson, S. D. et Bechler, C. (1998). Examining the Relationship Between Listening Effectiveness and Leadership Emergence: Perceptions, Behaviors, and Recall. Small Group Research, 29(4), 452‑471.

Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H. et Contractor, N. (2004). Network Theory and Small Groups. Small Group Research, 35(3), 307‑332. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496404264941

Keller, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 547‑555. https://doi: 10.2307/3069369

Kelly, J. R. et J. E. McGrath. (1988). On Time and Method. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.

Keyton, J. (1999). Group Communication. Mountain View, CA : Mayfield Publishing Company.

Knowles, E. (1973). Boundaries around group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 327‑331.

Kostopoulos, K. C., & Bozionelos, N. (2011). Team Exploratory and Exploitative Learning : Psychological Safety, Task Conflict, and Team Performance. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 385‑415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111405985

Lacharité, B. et Pasquier, A. (2014). L’intersectionnalité appliquée: Un projet pilote à Montréal. Nouvelles pratiques sociales, 26(2), 251. https://doi: 10.7202/1029274ar

Lai, K. W., Pratt, K., Anderson, M. et Stigter, J. (2006). Literature Review and Synthesis: Online Communities of Practice, 99. Récupéré de Zotero. 

Lamont, M. (2010). How professors think: inside the curious world of academic judgment (1. paperback ed). Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard Univ. Press. Récupéré de Gemeinsamer Bibliotheksverbund ISBN. 

Landry, S. (1977). Le groupe de tâche et sa psychologie. Dans J. M. Leclerc (Éd.), Dossier sur l’enseignement : Système, méthodes, techniques (p. 1‑31). Service pédagogique de l’Université de Montréal.

Landry, S. (1988). Le processus d’émergence de la structure du pouvoir dans les groupes restreints : la place des femmes et la place des hommes. Montréal.

Landry, S. (2007). Travail, affection et pouvoir dans les groupes restreints : le modèle des trois zones dynamiquesGestion. Québec : Presses de l’Université du Québec. Récupéré de (Jefferson or Adams Bldg General or Area Studies Reading Rms HM736; .L36 2007)

Langer, S. K. (1942). Philosophy in a New Key. Harvard University. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.

Latané, B. (1981). The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343‑356.

Latané, B., Williams, K. et Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 822‑832.

Lau, D. C. et Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional Dynamics of Organizational Groups. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325. https://doi: 10.2307/259377

Leathers, D. G. (1972). Quality of group commination as a determinant of group production. Speech Monographs, 166‑173.

Leclerc, C. (1999). Comprendre et construire les groupes. Sainte-Foy, Québec : Presses de l’Université Laval. Récupéré de Library of Congress ISBN. (HM716 .L43 1999)

Lefrançois, M., Saint-Charles, J., Fortin, S. et des Rivières-Pigeon, C. (2017). « Leur façon de punir, c’est avec l’horaire ! » : Pratiques informelles de conciliation travail-famille au sein de commerces d’alimentation au Québec. Relations industrielles, 72(2), 294. https://doi: 10.7202/1040402ar

Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York : Harper & Row.

Lewin, Kurt. (1948). Resolving Social Conflict: Selected papers on group dynamics. New York : Harper.

Li, S.-C. S. (2007). Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Functional Perspective. Small Group Research, 38(5), 593‑614. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496407304335

MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame : University of Notre Dame Press.

Maisonneuve, J. (1982). Introduction à la psychosociologie. Paris : PUF.

Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kukenberger, M. R., Donsbach, J. S. et Alliger, G. M. (2015). Team Role Experience and Orientation: A Measure and Tests of Construct Validity. Group & Organization Management, 40(1), 6‑34. https://doi: 10.1177/1059601114562000

Mazlish, M. (1981). Leader and led, individual and group. Psychohistory review, 214‑237.

McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups : Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. : Prentice-Hall.

McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147‑174.

McGrath, J. E., Berdahl, J. L. et Arrow, H. (1996). Traits, Expectations, Culture and Clout: The Dynamics of diversity in Work Groups. Dans J. S. E et M. N. Ruderman (dir.), Diversity Work Teams, Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace. Washington DC : American Psychological Association.

McGrath, Joseph Edward et Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology : ideas, evidence, issues, and an agendaSage library of social research, v. 194. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publications. Récupéré de (McGill : HD66 M39 1994)

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. et Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415‑444. https://doi:org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

Mead, G. H. (1934). L’esprit, le Soi et la Société (1963e éd.). Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.

Meneses, R., Ortega, R., Navarro, J. et de Quijano, S. D. (2008). Criteria for Assessing the Level of Group Development (LGD) of Work Groups: Groupness, Entitativity, and Groupality as Theoretical Perspectives. Small Group Research, 39(4), 492‑514. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496408319787

Meyers, R. A. et Brashers, D. E. (1999). Inlfuence Process in Group Interaction. Dans L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran et M. S. Poole (dir.), The Handbook of Group Communication Theory & Research (p. 288‑312). Thousand Oaks : Sage. Récupéré de (HM736H255 1999)

Milliken, F. J. et Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402‑433. https://doi: 10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217

Mills, T. M. (1967). The Sociology of Small Groups. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. : Prentice-Hall.

Minami, H. et Tanaka, K. (1995). Social and Environmental Psychology: Transaction Between Physical Space and Group-Dynamic Processes. Environment and Behavior, 27, 43‑55.

Mongeau, P. (1982). Ceux qui comptent dans votre vie. Un test pour découvrir les réseaux d’influence qui ont façonné votre personnalité. Psychologie, 43‑45. Récupéré de (2010) http://pierremongeau.uqam.ca/k14461/res_perso/reseau_perso.php?projet=dev_logiciel&page=actuelle

Mongeau, P. (1997). Participation en groupe et métacognition. Interactions, 1, 176‑187.

Mongeau, P. et Saint-Charles, J. (2005). Communication et émergence du leadership dans les groupes. Dans J. Saint-Charles et P. Mongeau (dir.), Communication : horizons de pratiques et de recherches (p. 109‑130). Québec : Presse de l’Université du Québec.

Mongeau, P. et Saint-Charles, J. (2011). Approches communicationnelles des groupes dans les organisations. Dans S. Grosjean et L. Bonneville (dir.), Communication organisationnelle : approches, processus et enjeux (p. 253‑279). Montréal : Chenelière.

Mongeau, P. et Tremblay, J. (1994). Connaître votre profil et son effet sur les autres (Maxima, PUF). Montréal, Paris : Libre Expression, Maxima, diffusion Presses Universitaires de France.

Mongeau, P. et Tremblay, J. (1995a). Typologie des modes d’interaction en groupe de tâches. Revue québécoise de psychologie, 16(1).

Mongeau, P. et Tremblay, J. (1995b). Typologie des modes d’interaction en groupe de tâches. Revue québécoise de psychologie, 16, 135‑154.

Mongeau, P. et Tremblay, J. (2014). QAMIG Questionnaire d’auto-évaluation de ses modes d’interactions en groupe. Guide d’interprétation. Montréal : (s. é.).

Mongeau, P., Saint-Charles, J. et Tremblay, J. (2006). Communication et visions du groupe. Dans P. Mongeau et J. Saint-Charles (dir.), Communication : horizons de pratiques et de recherches – volume 2 (vol. II, p. 148‑190). Québec : Presse de l’Université du Québec.

Moreno, J. L. (1970). Fondements de la sociométrie (1934 Édition originale «Who Shall Survive? »). Paris : Presse Universitaires de France.

Moscovici, S. (1988). La machine à faire des dieux : sociologie et psychologie. Paris : Fayard.

Mucchielli, A. (1998). Approche systémique et communicationnelle des organisations. (s. l.) : A. Colin.

Mullen, B. et Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210‑227. Récupéré de Zotero. 

Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

O’Leary, M. et Cummings, J. N. (2007). The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 433. https://doi: 10.2307/25148802

Oh, H., Labianca, G. et Chung, M. (2006). A Multilevel Model of group Social Capital. Academy of Management Review, 31, 569‑582.

Orlikowski, W. J. et Scott, S. V. (2015). Exploring Material-Discursive Practices: Exploring Material-Discursive Practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 697‑705. https://doi: 10.1111/joms.12114

Orlitzky, M. et Hirokawa, R. Y. (2001). To Err is Human, to Correct for it Divine: A Meta-Analysis of Research Testing the Functional Theory of Group Decision-Making Effectiveness. Small Group Research, 32(3), 313‑341. https://doi: 10.1177/104649640103200303

Park, H. S. (2008). The Effects of Shared Cognition on Group Satisfaction and Performance: Politeness and Efficiency in Group Interaction. Communication Research, 35(1), 88‑108. https://doi: 10.1177/0093650207309363

Pavitt, C. (2014). An Interactive Input-Process-Output Model of Social Influence in Decision-Making Groups. Small Group Research, 45, 704‑730. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496414548353

Poole, M. et Hollingshead, A. B. (2005). Theories of Small Groups. Thousand Oaks : Sage.

Poole, M. S. et DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. Dans J. Ful et C. Steinfield (dir.), Organizations and communication technology (p. 175‑195). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.

Poole, S. M., Keyton, J. et Frey, L. R. (1999). Group communication Methodology. Dans The handbook of group communication theory & research (Sage, p. 92‑112). Thousand Oaks : Lawrence Frey, S. Dennis Gouran.

Poole. (1998). The Small Group Should Be the Fundamental Unit of Communication Research. Dans Communication: Views from the helm for the 21st century (p. 94‑97). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.

Postmes, T., Spears, R. et Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 918‑930.

Prohansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H. et Rivlin, L. G. (1970). Freedom of choice in a physical setting. Dans H. M. Prohansky, W. H. Ittelson et L. G. Rivlin (dir.), Environmental psychology: People and their physical settings (p. 177‑181). New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Putnam, L. L. et Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. Dans Randy Y. Hirokawa et M. S. Poole (dir.), Communication and Group Decision-Making (2^ièmeédition, p. 147‑178). Thousand Oaks : Sage.

Putnam, Linda L. (2015). Unpacking the Dialectic: Alternative Views on the Discourse-Materiality Relationship: The Discourse-Materiality Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 706‑716. https://doi: 10.1111/joms.12115

Resweber, J.-P. (2011). Les enjeux de l’interdisciplinarité. Questions de communication, (19), 171‑200. https://doi: 10.4000/questionsdecommunication.2661

Rice, R. W. (1983). The contingency model of leadership: some current issues. Basic appl. soc. Psychol., 69.

Robinson, D. T. et Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Getting A Laugh: Gender, Status, and Humor in Task Discussions. Social Forces, 80(1), 123‑158. https://doi: 10.1353/sof.2001.0085

Romero, E. et Pescosolido, A. (2008). Humor and group effectiveness. Human Relations, 61(3), 395‑418. https://doi: 10.1177/0018726708088999

Roschelle, J. et Teasley, S. D. (1995). The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. Dans C. O’Malley (dir.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (p. 69‑97). Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5

Rousseau, V. et Aubé, C. (2010). Team Self-Managing Behaviors and Team Effectiveness: The Moderating Effect of Task Routineness. Group & Organization Management, 35(6), 751‑781. https://doi: 10.1177/1059601110390835

Rousseau, V., Aubé, C. et Savoie, A. (2006). Teamwork Behaviors: A Review and an Integration of Frameworks. Small Group Research, 37(5), 540‑570. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496406293125

Rovio, E., Eskola, J., Kozub, S. A., Duda, J. L. et Lintunen, T. (2009). Can High Group Cohesion Be Harmful?: A Case Study of a Junior Ice-Hockey Team. Small Group Research, 40(4), 421‑435. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496409334359

Saint-Charles, J. et Mongeau, P. (2004). Un modèle communicationnel du groupe restreint : les structures de communication.

Saint-Charles, Johanne et Mongeau, P. (2005). L’étude des réseaux humains de communication. Dans Johanne Saint-Charles et P. Mongeau (dir.), Communication : horizons de pratiques et de recherches (p. 73‑99). Sainte-Foy : Presse de l’Université du Québec.

Saint-Charles, Johanne et Mongeau, P. (2006). Fondements d’un modèle communicationnel du groupe : structures et fonctions. Dans J. Saint-Charles et P. Mongeau (dir.), Communication : horizons de pratiques et de recherches, volume 2 (vol. II, p. 191‑208). Québec : Presse de l’Université du Québec.

Saint-Charles, Johanne et Mongeau, P. (2018). Social influence and discourse similarity networks in workgroups. Social Networks, 52, 228‑237. https://doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.09.001

Saint-Charles, Johanne. (2001). Pouvoir informationnel, structure formelle et réseau émergent dans une organisation (Thèse). Montréal : Université du Québec à Montréal. Récupéré de (AC20U5511 [D841 AC20U5511 D841)

Sanders, R. E. et Bonito, J. A. (2010). Speaking for the Institution: A Fourth Production Site for Group Members’ Influence Attempts. Small Group Research, 41(4), 427‑451. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496410366309

Sargent, L. D. et Sue-Chan, C. (2001). Does Diversity Affect Group Efficacy?: The Intervening Role of Cohesion and Task Interdependence. Small Group Research, 32(4), 426‑450. https://doi: 10.1177/104649640103200403

Sarker, S., Valacich, J. S. et Sarker, S. (2003). Virtual Team Trust: Instrument Development and Validation in an IS Educational Environment. Inf. Resour. Manage. J., 16(2), 35–55. https://doi: 10.4018/irmj.2003040103

Sauer, N. C. et Kauffeld, S. (2013). Meetings as Networks: Applying Social Network Analysis to Team Interaction. Communication Methods and Measures, 7(1), 26‑47. https://doi: 10.1080/19312458.2012.760729

Sauer, S. J. (2011). Taking the Reins: The Effects of New Leader Status and Leadership Style on Team Performance : Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 574-574‑587. Récupéré de Francis. 

Saulnier, M. et Saint-Charles, J. (2008). A model of deviance in workgroups. Ordinateur Joh.

Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior. Holt Rinehart.

Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior. New York : Holt Rinehart.

Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R. et Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 745‑772.

Scott, C. R. (1999). Communication Technology and Group Communication. Dans L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran et M. S. Poole (dir.), The handbook of group communication theory & research (p. 251‑288). Thousand Oaks : Sage. Récupéré de (HM736H255 1999)

Sell, J., Lovaglia, M. J., Mannix, E. A., Samuelson, C. D. et Wilson, R. K. (2004). Investigating Conflict, Power, and Status Within and Among Groups. Small Group Research, 35(1), 44‑72. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496403259813

Shaw, J. B. et Barrett-Power, E. (1998). The Effects of Diversity on Small Work Group Processes and Performance. Human Relations, 51(10), 1307‑1325. https://doi: 10.1177/001872679805101005

Simmel, G. (1908). Sociologie : étude sur les formes de la socialisation ( Lilyane Deroche-Gurcel et Sibylle Muller, trad.). Paris : Presses universitaires de France.

Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Oriña, M. M. et Rothman, A. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. Dans M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. A. Simpson et J. F. Dovidio (dir.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 3: Interpersonal relations. (p. 393‑420). Washington : American Psychological Association. Récupéré de CrossRef. 

Simsarian Webber, S. (2002). Leadership and trust facilitating cross‐functional team success. Journal of Management Development, 21(3), 201‑214. https://doi: 10.1108/02621710210420273

Smith, K. K. et Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.

Sommer, R. (1965). Further studies in small group ecology. Sociometry, 337‑348.

Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J. et Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social Networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316‑325. https://doi: 10.2307/3069458

Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 1005‑1016.

Spink, K. S. (1990). Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. Journal of Sport and Exercise Physiology, 301‑311.

St-Arnaud, Y. (1978). Les petits groupes : participation et communication (2002e éd.). (s. l.) : G. Morin. Récupéré de (302.3/4 HM133 S22.2002 HM133 S22.2002 UQAM.E.M HM133 S22.2002 UQAM.E.M HM133 S22.2002 UQAM.C.M)

St-Cyr-Bouchard, M. et Saint-Charles, J. (2018). La communication et le succès des équipes interdisciplinaires. Communiquer. Revue de communication sociale et publique, 23, 21‑38. Récupéré de http://journals.openedition.org/communiquer/2917

Stasser, G. et Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81‑93.

Stasser, G. L. (1999). The Uncertain Role of Unshared Information in Collective Choice. Dans Leigh L. Thompson et D. M. John M. Levine (dir.), Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (p. 49‑69). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Steinel, W., Van Kleef, G. A., Van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M. A., Homan, A. C. et Moffitt, G. (2010). How intragroup dynamics affect behavior in intergroup conflict: The role of group norms, prototypicality, and need to belong. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(6), 779‑794. https://doi: 10.1177/1368430210375702

Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group performance of unitary tasks. Dans I. D. Steiner (dir.), Group process and productivity (p. 14‑39). New York : Academic Press.

Steinzor, B. (1950). The spatial factor in face to face discussion groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 552‑555.

Sternberg, R. J. et Vroom, V. (2002). The person versus the situation in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 301‑323. https://doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00101-7

Stewart, D. D. (1998). Stereotypes, negativity bias, and the discussion of unshared information in decision-making groups. Small Group Research, 29, 643‑669.

Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of the llterature. New York : The Free Press.

Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P. et Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams. American Psychologist, 45, 120‑133.

Suzuki, Y. (1986). A Study in seat-taking in meetings stituations: Territorial maintenance and status in group. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 83‑86.

Sylvie Grosjean. (2008). Communication dans un centre de répartition des urgences 911. Canadian Joumal of Communication, 33, 101‑120.

Thatcher, S. M. B. et Patel, P. C. (2012). Group Faultlines: A Review, Integration, and Guide to Future Research. Journal of Management, 38(4), 969‑1009. https://doi: 10.1177/0149206311426187

Thompson, L. L. (2002). Making the Team. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice-Hall.

Trist, E. et Bamforth, D. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Human Relations, 4, 3‑38.

Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 384‑399.

Tuckman, B. W. et Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited. Group & Organization Studies, 2(4), 419‑427. https://doi: 10.1177/105960117700200404

Vacher, B. (2006). L’invisible et structurante matérialité de l’information et de la communication organisationnelles : une grille de lecture. Communication et organisation, (30), 230‑249. https://doi: 10.4000/communicationorganisation.3483

Valacich, J. S. et Schwenk, C. (1995). Structuring conflict in individual, face-to-face, and computer-mediated group decision making: Carping versus objective devil’s advocacy. Decision Sciences, 369‑393.

van Knippenberg, D. et Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work Group Diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 515‑541. https://doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546

Van Knippenberg, D., Casten, K. et Homan, A. (2004). Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008‑1022.

van Vree, W. (2011). Meetings: The Frontline of Civilization. The Sociological Review, 59(1_suppl), 241‑262. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.01987.x

Vroom, V. H., Jago, A. G. et Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and Decision-Making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(4), 556. https://doi: 10.2307/2392210

Wall, V. D. et Nolan, L. L. (1986). Perceptions of inequity, satisfaction and conflict in task oriented groups. Human Relations, 39, 1033‑1052.

Weick, K. (1969). The Social Psychology of Organizing. Ontario : Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, Ca : Sage Publications.

Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53(3), 352‑380. https://doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90070-N

Westaby, J. D., Woods, N. et Pfaff, D. L. (2016). Extending dynamic network theory to group and social interaction analysis: Uncovering key behavioral elements, cycles, and emergent states. Organizational Psychology Review, 6, 34‑62. https://doi: 10.1177/2041386614551319

Wheelan, S. A. (1994). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.

Wheelan, S. A., & McKeage, R. L. (1993). Developmental Patterns in Small and Large Groups. Small Group Research, 24, 60‑83.

Wheelan, Susan A. (2005). Group processes : A developmental perspective (2nd ed). Allyn and Bacon.

Wheelan, Susan A. (2009). Group Size, Group Development, and Group Productivity. Small Group Research, 40(2), 247‑262. https://doi: 10.1177/1046496408328703

Wheelan, Susan A. (2009). Group Size, Group Development, and Group Productivity. Small Group Research, 40(2), 247‑262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408328703

Wheelan, Susan A., Davidson, B., & Tilin, F. (2003). Group Development Across Time : Reality or Illusion? Small Group Research, 34(2), 223‑245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496403251608

Winquist, J. R. et Larson, J. R. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 371‑377.

Wise, S. (2014). Can a team have too much cohesion? The dark side to network density. European Management Journal, 32(5), 703‑711. https://doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.005

Wittenbaum, G. M. et Moreland, R. L. (2008). Small-Group Research in Social Psychology: Topics and Trends over Time. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 187‑203. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00065.x

Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B. et Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71(3), 286‑310. https://doi: 10.1080/0363452042000299894

Worchel, S. (1994). You can go home again: Returning group research to the group context with an eye on developmental issues. Small Group Research, Special Issue: Social cognition in small groups, 205‑233.

Yulk, G. A. (2006). Leadership in Organizations / Gary Yukl (6e éd.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey : Prentice Hall.